Re: XML_RPC over SSL patch
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:28:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: XML_RPC over SSL patch | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-12815@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Wolfram Kriesing wrote:
> Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Wolfram Kriesing wrote:
> >
> >
> >>attached there is a patch which makes XML_RPC also work over SSL
> >>it uses HTTP_Request. since XML_RPC is a base-package (or whatever
> >>this is called) HTTP_Request might need to become one too, if this is
> >>acceptable.
> >>i've tested it using HTTPS, HTTP, HTTP+Auth, HTTPS+Auth, i havent
> >>tested the proxy, but since it uses HTTP_Request for that the chances
> >>that it works are quite high i guess :-)
> >
> >
> > HTTP_Request again depends on Net_Socket and Net_URL. I really want to
> > keep the number of packages required to make the installer work as low as
> > possible, to reduce the number of unknowns somewhat.
>
> yeah i understand that, sure
>
> > Let's make a compromise:
> >
> > The HTTPS support is implemented in a separate method (for example
> > sendPayloadHTTPS10). The first thing you do in this method is
> > @include_once "HTTP/Request.php", and if it fails you raise an error about
> > requiring HTTP_Request for HTTPS support (I do the same thing in
> > PEAR/Remote.php for XML_RPC).
>
> ok, so the sendPayloadHTTP10 (not HTTPS) needs to detect the protocol,
> right? and forward to sendPayloadHTTPS10 in case port 443 is used.
> i think that would be cool. shall i hack it and send to you?
Please do.
- Stig