Re: Socket_Socket as "extended copy" of Net_Socket

From: Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 03:29:21 +0000
Subject: Re: Socket_Socket as "extended copy" of Net_Socket
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13044@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 07:41:38PM +0100, Stephan Seidt wrote: > I just suggested the "Socket" category some time ago > and also its first package Socket_Socket. > > To use it seriously I thought about some compatiblity > options with the Net_Socket package. What about sth like: > > if (!extension_loaded('sockets')) { > return &new Net_Socket; > } > > I copy Net_Socket to Socket_Socket and change the code > in it to work with the new sockets. I also add the new > functions bind, listen, accept, select, etc. Why don't you just make Net_Socket "smarter"? Introducing two socket packages seems redundants to me (although I don't really know what additional functionality is to be provided by your Socket_Socket class). -- Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)

« previous php.pear.dev (#13044) next »