Re: Proposed Package (again): Enterprise Authentication & Authorization

I got a couple +1, no -1's but I didn't get the five I needed. I assume, then this is a no-go or what? --Tony On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Alan Knowles wrote: > +1, as long as one of these two end up with some docs in peardoc2 :) > > Regards > Alan > > > Markus Wolff wrote: > > >On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:32:08 -0600 (CST) > >Tony Bibbs <tony@tonybibbs.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Man, has this come full circle. > >> > >> > > > >Ain´t democracy great? ;-) > > > > > > > >>Well, while the folks working on LiveUser had the best intentions on > >>working with me on this, time committments have prevented them from giving > >>this the attention it needs and have since encouraged me to repost this > >>here. The idea is after things slow down we will revisit merging again > >>and while I welcome this I don't plan on holding my breath. > >> > >>To prevent re-posting everything, here is the original proposal I > >>submitted: > >> > > >>>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=104256945332548&w=2 > >> > >>Questions and comments are welcome again but I hope we have beat this to > >>death and a vote can take place soon... > >> > >> > > > >Well, so here´s my +1 for you in case I didn´t give that in the previous > >thread. A quick summary to all who have not followed the thread and > >don´t have the time to catch up: > > > >- Enterprise A&A and LiveUser both try to achieve the same goals > >- The packages have different API´s. Therefore it might make sense to > > have both packages in PEAR, so the user has a broader choice - not > > every developer likes the same API styles. > >- As far as I´ve seen, Enterprise A&A follows PEAR coding guidelines and > > the code seems well-documented. > >- While LiveUser started out using just an RDBMS to store its data, EA&A > > is using RPC calls from the beginning (SOAP I guess - this feature is > > planned for LiveUser as well, but not yet implemented). > > > >Unfortunately, I didn´t have enough time to dig into the differences > >between the packages any further (which is why we postponed the > >discussion of a possible merge), so this is all I can say ATM. > > > >Regards, > > Markus > > > > > > > > -- Tony Bibbs "I guess you have to remember that those who don't tony@tonybibbs.com hunt or fish often see those of us who do as harmlessly strange and sort of amusing. When you think about it, that might be a fair assessment." --Unknown