Re: pear account

On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 00:53, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On 24 Feb 2003 15:48:46 -0800 > Walt Boring <waboring@3gstech.com> wrote: > > > Yes. I guess I shouldn't have been so lame and not included the url > > :) > > You got my vote (the horrible +1 ;) > > But there is still the "problem" of the package name, CS, and the > release process. You can release it under pearweb without having > it in the cvs tree(i.e. if you already your own cvs server). > > As a sidenote, you can provide a pear compliant package without being in > PEAR, that is already widely used. This solution does not impose the > name convention (but it's good to keep your modules in a clean namespace > to skip conflict with others components), and you do not have to change > anything in your library. I may have misunderstood you Pierre, but one may /not/ release a package through pearweb without doing the "name thing" first. The "new package" page clearly says so. - Stig