Re: RFC: Commentation- and Rating-System für PEAR-Websites
| From: | rocha at i-node dot com dot br | Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:17:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Commentation- and Rating-System für PEAR-Websites | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13951@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Citando Martin Jansen <mj@php.net>:
> On Wed Feb 26, 2003 at 08:4028PM +0100, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> > The idea is pretty simple. Because of many PEAR packages having
> > no online-documentation and to complete the existing examples
> > their should be IMHO a possibility to leave some comments on
> > each package. I think the best way is to link the comments
> > together with the packages themself (respectively the
> > corresponding webpage with closer information) and on the other
> > hand with the corresponding manual-pages. (Whereupon we have to
> > think how manuals with multiple pages should be linked).
>
> Having such a system will make most developers write absolutely no
> documentation for their package, because they expect their users to
> leave some comments instead. I'm -1 on this.
Well, that classe will not qualify for PFC either. And in the long run
the comments can help that lazy developer to write some doc with his
class.
Hum... so, should i write +1 here?
This binary pool is going out of control ;)
Sebastiao Rocha
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/