Re: RFC: Commentation- and Rating-System für PEAR-Websites

It's not a good idea to free a developer of his/her task to write an documentation! But additional comments are a good start... +1 By the way, is there a way to begin a newsgroup (or forum) where "end dev/user" can ask questions and help each other. I know there's "pear.general", but I guess some people would prefer a new group... cya jochen Schneider rocha@i-node.com.br wrote:

Citando Martin Jansen <mj@php.net>:

On Wed Feb 26, 2003 at 08:4028PM +0100, Tobias Schlitt wrote:

The idea is pretty simple. Because of many PEAR packages having no online-documentation and to complete the existing examples their should be IMHO a possibility to leave some comments on each package. I think the best way is to link the comments together with the packages themself (respectively the corresponding webpage with closer information) and on the other hand with the corresponding manual-pages. (Whereupon we have to think how manuals with multiple pages should be linked).

Having such a system will make most developers write absolutely no documentation for their package, because they expect their users to leave some comments instead. I'm -1 on this.

Well, that classe will not qualify for PFC either. And in the long run the comments can help that lazy developer to write some doc with his class. Hum... so, should i write +1 here? This binary pool is going out of control ;) Sebastiao Rocha ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/