Re: update on HTML_Template_ReIT proposal

<borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote : > Greetings! > > I repackaged my IT[X] fork, the class name is now HTML_Template_ReIT and it is > a single class unlike HTML_Template_IT/HTML_Template_ITX hierarchy. > > I also made some improvements to the code, the main one is that now <!-- > INCLUDE --> functionality *works* with template caching. The added bonus is > that error reporting also works when there are problems reading INCLUDE'd > files. > > Thus the only thing that requires more work is callback functionality. I also > promise to do docs (they will be applicable to stock IT[X] as well). > > The class can be reviewed: > http://158.250.10.119/pear/ReIT.phps > and downloaded (with readme file and unit testing suite): > http://158.250.10.119/pear/HTML_Template_ReIT.tar.gz > > As the package was essentially accepted to PEAR and there were no objections > to HTML_Template_ReIT name: is it OK now to register it? > It would be nice if you could add the necessary methods (for example getCurrentBlock) to current ITX in order to have it work with your QuickForm renderer. Is this possible ? TIA Bertrand Mansion Mamasam