How about HTML_Template_Sigma? (was: Re: [PEAR-DEV] update on HTML_Template_ReIT proposal)

21 Март 2003 17:53, Alexey Borzov написал: > 21 Март 2003 16:17, LIMBOURG Arnaud написал: > > Not again, my mailbox cannot handle this one more time. > > > > Stig: could you express an opinion on this issue ? To me (and that is my > > opinion) we need somebody to make a decision and stig is well placed for > > that. > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=104607169523640&w=2 OK, I have re-read the previous flames myself, including the comments Stig made. Besides I received some comments off-list concerning my proposal (thanks!). This helped me to understand that HTML_Template_ReIT is in fact an unnecessarily provocative name, and that accepting the package with such a name will indeed make PEAR look bad. As I am now a part of PEAR community (you are free to argue on how good a part I am) I don't want this to happen, too. Yet I don't want to drop my proposal either, *especially* after some respected PEAR developers have got into tantrums in this list. So here is a sort of compromise proposal: 1) I propose my package to PEAR as HTML_Template_Sigma. 2) I will drop the words "fork", "rewrite" and such from its description/documentation. It will only be said that "the package implements Integrated Templates API" (which is true, of course).