Re: Re: Package Proposal: Pear_Info
| From: | Davey | Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:14:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Package Proposal: Pear_Info | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-15311@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
OK,
I changed the code to not show the Latest Version unless theres a newer one than the local one, and I wonder if I should move that row upto to below the "Version" row and call that row "Installed Version" or "Local Version" or "Current Version"?
- Davey
Davey wrote:
Jon Parise wrote:On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:49:29AM +0100, Davey wrote:hunh?Added the space, that was there first time I did this but I accidently deleted the .php instead of the .phps and had to start all the new stuff over. Also I made it show everyones role, it's not part of the link so it stands out. Also made the package titles links as requested :)Thanks!Anything else?It looks like there are extra spaces after the names in the website and documentation team credits.In the "main" package information listing, it looks like "Version" and "Latest Version" are always the same. I suggest combining them into a single row (named "Version") and only differentiating between them if they differ.Meaning I don't show the Latest Version if its the same as the local one? Will do that.The "Information" row always seem to point to point to the package's web site. Perhaps that row could be removed and the centered package name heading could link to the package's home.Hmm, not sure about that. But the idea is to link to the packages docs when those are linkable in some uniform way (i.e. pear.php.net/manual/packageName or put the docs url into the Registry stuff). So it has "<a href="http://pear.php.net/packageName">Info</a> <a href="http://pear.php.net/manual/packageName">Manual</a>" and anything else anyone wants to add in the Information row... - Davey