Re: Future of Time Span class.
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:01:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Future of Time Span class. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-15436@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:01:42 -0300
Leandro Lucarella <luca@lucarella.com.ar> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I could finally upload the (now) Time_Span class and I was thinking
> about the name and the upcoming namespaces in PHP5, so I'm wondering
> if since this it's new class maybe it would be better to rename it to
> Date_Span or Date_TimeSpan. I suppose that every PEAR package would
> have a namespace and since Time_Span would be in Date package I think
> that it must be in the Date "namespace" (Date_).
>
> So, what do you think?
Yes, Date_ should be the name space, but maybe there is a shorter
solution, can you remember us the link to the sources?
> PS: I know there's someone here (sorry, I don't remember who it is)
> who
> is working in a PHP5 extension that implements all the stuff in
> Date package, so I don't know if its ok to think about the future
> of Date package in PHP5.
We discussed about php_date and time span data, plans exist to allow an
easy switch to php_date when it will be published, I keep you informed
asap.
hth
pierre