Re: PEAR_Info...

this package is great work, but how come that the first official release in PEAR, the first package you build has package state: stable? I dislike ppl saying their first releases they did are stable from the beginning on... also 1.0.1 had already a little bug/mistake in the package and you had to release a fixed version one day after the original "stable" release, I don't want to blame you or anything, but first releases should be alpha (if software is completly new) or beta (already testing done...) Stable means that companies will install it on production servers, since I am Linux-Administrator at work, I really care for state: stable.... I know that PEAR has no strict rules for this... but stable should be carefully used... This also applies to other PEAR packages... Mirco