Re: Re-Proposing Package: Console_phpman instead of PHP_phpi

From: Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 11:04:06 +0000
Subject: Re: Re-Proposing Package: Console_phpman instead of PHP_phpi
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-15876@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:30:21AM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote: > +1 here, > > few CS fixes - > quite a few methods in Console_phpman are still this_is_the_method, > rather than thisIsTheMethod. > class should really be Ucfirst = Console_Phpman or Console_PhpMan .. > you should break up the lib into seperate files for each class. > > an ini file or config package compatible 'config file' would be nice .. > > Otherwise looks great.. > Regards > Alan > Okay, i renamed the functions and class, split the file up and use an ini file now for configuration. Source isn't up yet, i have to test it yet. I think i will propose the other classes as own packages, if they don't get accepted, how should i name the files? And should i rename the classes too? 'pear package' notes that they aren't prefixed with the package name. Stefan

« previous php.pear.dev (#15876) next »