Re: Package Proposal: HTTP_Download

LIMBOURG Arnaud wrote:

IMHO, it will be hard to do it without a) changing HTTP_Request into a class that has two sets of methods that don't interact with each other much, which doesn't make much sense imho, or b) breaking BC. I was using HTTP_Request first, tried to change it, gave up and wrote the new class.

If there is no way to keep BC then dump HTTP_Request to version 2.0 and state clearly that is is a BC release.

i kinda like to agree with Stefan, and let the package be a seperate one. We dont need to bloat HTTP_Request with stuff not everybody needs. If someone needs an HTTP-download (and that person will know!) then he will download it. just my thoughts -- Wolfram ... opensource @ vision:produktion ... http://opensource.visionp.de ... translating template engine .... http://sf.net/projects/simpletpl ... authentication system .... http://sf.net/projects/auth