Re: [REMINDER] Package Proposal: HTML_Sax

From: Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 01:04:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [REMINDER] Package Proposal: HTML_Sax
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16203@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Agreed, HTML_Sax_Parser or HTML_Parser_Sax? (the latter whilst not being so nice is better for allowing other parsers in.... - Davey Alan Knowles wrote:
On a theoritical basis XML_HTMLSax is ok, but the end users/vistor to the website is going to say mmh, "I need an html parser" - where are they going to look 90% of the time?
+1 for XML_HTMLSax... I think it fits better in the XML category, as most of the stuff in the HTML category is more for displaying various HTML elements, not parsing them... also, SAX is normally associated with XML.
+1. And I agree with XML_HTMLSax and the XML category


« previous php.pear.dev (#16203) next »