Re: [REMINDER] Package Proposal: HTML_Sax
| From: | Xavier Noguer | Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 14:46:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [REMINDER] Package Proposal: HTML_Sax | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16210@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
El Lun 12 May 2003 20:40, Alan Knowles escribió:
> On a theoritical basis XML_HTMLSax is ok, but the end users/vistor to
> the website is going to say mmh, "I need an html parser" - where are
> they going to look 90% of the time?
That's a different problem. I think the 1 category per package policy is
flawed. This is not the first package for which I say: "mmmhhh... this could
fit in this category... but it could also fit here".
OT: Congrats on your first child Harry!
> >>+1 for XML_HTMLSax... I think it fits better in the XML category, as
> >>most of the stuff in the HTML category is more for displaying various
> >>HTML elements, not parsing them... also, SAX is normally associated
> >>with XML.
> >
> > +1. And I agree with XML_HTMLSax and the XML category