Re: bug in DB_Pager

Richard I hadn't seen your mod, thanks for pointing this out :-) I've used DB_Pager in about 50 scripts and was about to embark on the somewhat painful conversion to Pager because my customers don't can't seem to appreciate the 'googleness' of DB_Pager's default output. When Alain pointed out that DB_Pager actually follows Google's example I was surprised as I hadn't noticed after so many Google searches the incrementing maxpages. To the maintainers, can Richard's mod be considered as an alternative output for the official DB_Pager, either in its own method or referenced with an optional DB_PAGER_FIXED_MAX_PAGES argument? cheers Demian Richard Wall wrote:

On 2003-06-03 21:44, Demian Turner wrote:

I see what you mean, I hadn't noticed beforehand that Google does this as well. Seems quirky, I'd be curious to know how to disable the 'feature' and get just 10 links throughout the resultset.

I know what you mean. I submitted an alternative a while ago, but am not sure that it ever got added... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102742059100001&r=1&w=2 -RichardWall.