Re[2]: [Zend Engine 2] ZendEngine2/RFCs/002.txt

On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:49:35 +0200 Harald Radi <harald.radi@nme.at> wrote: > > I think the 'HTML_Table'-type naming should go the way of the > > dodo. The 'HTML:Table:Table' naming might make sense -- or > > rather 'PEAR:HTML:Table:Table'. It's referencing the Table > > class in the 'PEAR:HTML:Table' namespace. > > $table = new PEAR:HTML:Table:Table(); > > d'oh, -1 > > > why should Table.php declare something outside its Table class ? > > and if it does, couldn't we simple say that the class definition goes > into > the PEAR:HTML namespace and the rest goes into the PEAR:HTML:<classname> > namespace. > or isn't it possible to have a class and a namespace with the same name. I suggest to name namespaces in lower case. So things for the table to work should go in a pear:html:table package which content may be used by 10% of the Table class users (expert users). And the Table class itself, that may be used without reference to pear:html:table package content, should go in the pear:html package. Look for example the JTree class which is in the javax.swing package and the javax.swing.tree that contains utility stuff. Didier.