RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: granting temporary permission for releasing packages that need a
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Thu, 07 Aug 2003 08:30:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: granting temporary permission for releasing packages that need a | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19371@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From: Davey [mailto:davey@php.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:23 AM
> To: pear-dev@lists.php.net
> Greg Beaver wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's been an unfortunate problem recently that sometimes lead
developers
> > don't have the time to do a new release, and so a buggy release sits
out
> > there for ages. Nobody can change the lead developer's time frame,
and
> > I don't think that's a solution.
> >
> > The solution is to set up a system where certain top-level PEAR
folks
> > who work on the core can run PEAR_PackageFileManager against the cvs
of
> > a package, and do a new release. Is there any interest in such a
> > system? It would not be hard to code a short web-based script for
> > pear.php.net admins that would accept a package name, a short
changelog
> > to use as a release information, and use the existing package.xml to
> > create a new one and do a release.
> >
> > Greg
> >
>
> The only problems I can forsee with such a system are these:
>
> 1) What if there things that are incomplete? I assume you mean to run
it
> on the current CVS version?
>
> 2) The last thing most developers probably write, is package.xml,
> therefore any cvs version is most likely out of date.
>
> I think a better solution would be the ability to change the status of
> said package back to beta or alpha, if it is marked as stable.
This sounds like a job for pear-qa to me.
The idea that was originally formed on pear-qa is that there would be
1-2 people assigned to each category. These people should know all the
packages in their category fairly well and should therefore be able to
handle this.
Regards,
Lukas