Re: Package Proposal - DateRange and Range - Range Category Needed.

For the record, are we talking about documentation category, or package name? I think Range is fine for a package name. For documentation category, I don't think Range is a good name. Categories don't always reflect types. "PEAR" is not a type, and "Logging" is also not a type. Category names like "Streams" are also there, but also "Tools and Utilities." I only suggest Abstract Types because this is the first place I would look for something like range. You can put Range in the Abstract Types category, and still implement the package Range with factory method as you described. This is my personal opinion. It also may change over the next couple of days. Again, I am not giving +1 or -1 until I've at least slept on the question, especially after recent debate over package review :). Regards, Greg