Re: replies to all waiting questions about HTML_Progress
| From: | Laurent Laville | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:00:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: replies to all waiting questions about HTML_Progress | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20061@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Stefan,
Lot of works at my office, i have no free time until now to have a better
look on your inprovement.
Now it's done ! And YES i like it :)
> Well, yes and no. It's not an "initial position" like giving "it
> start at this or that pixel". You just have to give it a relative
> left and top at 0px. But using that it works fine, doesn't it? And if
> you move the div somewhere else it still works fine - since the
> position is relative.
>
> What do you think about the layer-solution? Wouldn't this generally
> be a good idea since I believe layers are more well-implemented in
> all browsers than DOM-changes are? Taking Opera 6 as an example ...
> This way you could drop all dom-code ... or am I wrong? Have you had
> time to review the proposal in depth?
Yes, and i will continue to review your proposal in depth to see if my new
features
i want to put in next version 0.6.0 will match good this evening. i 'll keep
you aware in next hours
>
> What do you mean? It basically needs the small addition like
> mentioned before. And afaik you can put it in a table or somewhere
> and the relative div still works. That's what I found out.
> Could you make your thoughts mentioned in the last paragraph a bit
> more clearer, please?
I'm wrong, sorry ! i misunderstood "position:relative" with screen
coordinates.
I've just try your patch "progress1b.html" with my example 6 (template
integration)
and all fines.VERY GOOD, i have a doubt before , but no more now.
Later
Laurent