Re: replies to all waiting questions about HTML_Progress

From: Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:00:23 +0000
Subject: Re: replies to all waiting questions about HTML_Progress
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20061@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Stefan, Lot of works at my office, i have no free time until now to have a better look on your inprovement. Now it's done ! And YES i like it :) > Well, yes and no. It's not an "initial position" like giving "it > start at this or that pixel". You just have to give it a relative > left and top at 0px. But using that it works fine, doesn't it? And if > you move the div somewhere else it still works fine - since the > position is relative. > > What do you think about the layer-solution? Wouldn't this generally > be a good idea since I believe layers are more well-implemented in > all browsers than DOM-changes are? Taking Opera 6 as an example ... > This way you could drop all dom-code ... or am I wrong? Have you had > time to review the proposal in depth? Yes, and i will continue to review your proposal in depth to see if my new features i want to put in next version 0.6.0 will match good this evening. i 'll keep you aware in next hours > > What do you mean? It basically needs the small addition like > mentioned before. And afaik you can put it in a table or somewhere > and the relative div still works. That's what I found out. > Could you make your thoughts mentioned in the last paragraph a bit > more clearer, please? I'm wrong, sorry ! i misunderstood "position:relative" with screen coordinates. I've just try your patch "progress1b.html" with my example 6 (template integration) and all fines.VERY GOOD, i have a doubt before , but no more now. Later Laurent

« previous php.pear.dev (#20061) next »