Re: New Cache Class

Christion Stocker wrote: > Hi > There are already 2 different Cache "Classes" in PEAR. > Therefore the usual questions: > What makes your approach so differnt to be included in PEAR in contrast > to the others? > What's the difference to the existing ones? > Can't you merge your effort with one of the others? > chregu Well, it is a very small and easy to handle system. As we could call ~200 lines of code a "system". And I'm sure there are many users still having problems with the implementation of the existing cache packages. Mostly there are (correct me if i'm wrong) just selfmade classes which are rough ported to PEAR, without real examples and helpfull documentation. So even if the existing packages are good, the problem is to tell the people how to use it without a good manual. That's one thing I'd like to change ;) -- David Rech mailto:david.rech@mindwood.com