AW: [PEAR-DEV] [Proposal] XML_RDDL

Hi, > I noticed that you mention that string inputs aren't > supported because > XML_Parser needs work. I know we've discussed this already, > but I want > to find out what we can do to get XML_Parser up to speed. > > Here's a patch that fixes the 2 bugs you've mentioned previously > (<a>http://</a> breaking setInput(), and parse() > failing on > large files): > > http://www.exclupen.com/misc/pear/XML_Parser-setInput-parse.diff 1. I did not want to base a new class on a patch, that hasn't been released, so I will implement this as soon as a new version of XML_Parser has been released. 2. I still don't like the file_exists(), if you want to parse a file, I think setInputFile() should be used. I don't think that it's bad if you have to use seperate methods for seperate tasks. But it's not in my hands, which patch will make it into a release. I think I can live with the current patch, at least I did not find any bugs or showstoppers. I don't know, who will decide on this as Stig does not seem to be very active in the pear-dev mailinglist... 3. I'll put some effort in the XML_Parser class, cause there are some issues that should be addressed and some features that are missing. It would be nice of you to give me some feedback on XML_RDDL or even a +1. Stephan