Re: Problems with Date.php 1.3.1 beta

From: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:36:29 +0000
Subject: Re: Problems with Date.php 1.3.1 beta
Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21663@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
>On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:11:57 +0200 >LIMBOURG Arnaud <arnaud.limbourg.prestataire@cegetel.fr> wrote: > >> > > elseif (preg_match('/\d{8}/',$date)) { >> > > $this->setDate($date.'000000',DATE_FORMAT_TIMESTAMP); >> > > } >> > >> > preg_match('/$\d{8}^/',$date) is the way. Thanks to have reported >> > this bug. >> >> $ is for end of line while ^ is for beginning of line, didn't you >> invert those two in your mail ? > >I did, once I did not copy/paste :) > >pierre Shouldn't a check such as function Date($date = null) { if (is_null($date)) { // create default Date object } else if (is_string($date)) { // handle timestamp/ISO formats } else { // handle unix timestamps } } be sufficient since the two other date formats should be strings. The fix posted earlier would cause any timestamps in the range 10000000-99999999 to be misinterpreted as timestamps rather than as unixtimestamps. Not too big of a deal since those dates are in the 70s, but for consistency's sake should probably be fixed. chris

« previous php.pear.dev (#21663) next »