Re: PEAR-PECL relations announcement
| From: | Kevin | Date: | Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:59:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR-PECL relations announcement | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-21903@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
So I take it your moving packages like bz2 out of PEAR and over to PECL?
<pear-group@php.net> wrote in message
news:008e01c3810e$391f3e60$4d00a8c0@vandal...
> Hi,
>
> just to make things a bit clearer, because I have the feeling that this
> did not get communicated clearly enough.
>
> PECL used to be a subproject of PEAR. However the PEAR Group felt that
> this hindered PECL more than it helped. We therefore decided to give
> leadership of PECL to a separate entity, so that PECL could gain more
> momentum. PECL leadership could come up with its own regulations etc.
>
> As you may have noticed from Wez's announcement
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=106392922123993&w=2) the
> other day, he has taken over this position.
>
> So what does that mean for PEAR?
>
> Actually we think it doesn't change things a lot for PEAR at all.
> Development of packages will go on as usual. PECL packages never really
> fit into our peer review process anyways so that PECL package where
> never much of a topic on the PEAR lists.
>
> We will however continue to provide infrastructure in the form of
> pearweb and the pear installer. These will be used by PECL just as
> before. However PECL will get its own site with its own look and feel
> over at pecl.php.net.
>
> As a result only issues with pearweb internals (not typos which should
> go to peclwebmaster) on pecl.php.net should be discussed on PEAR lists.
> Only issues with the installer not issues with PECL packages itself
> should be discussed on PEAR mailinglists. When in doubt first contact
> the PECL lists.
>
> We will probably soon create a new mailinglist to discuss the PEAR
> infrastructure. Until then pear-dev is the place to go.
>
> So what does that mean for PECL?
>
> As mentioned above PECL will get its own regulations. All PECL related
> discussions will take place on their own mailinglists. We already
> separated the CVS and the CVS commit list a while back. So I guess this
> change really did not come out of nowhere.
>
> We think this will mean that both projects can now better focus on their
> specific issues. The community for each while having considerable
> overlap was also too large which sort of overwhelmed the PECL people.
> This step will therefore help build up a community feel among the PECL
> people and will also help us, the PEAR community, to focus on our
> strengths.
>
> The future looks bright yadayada ;-)
>
> Regards,
> the PEAR Group