Re: The point (BC breakage)

Daniel Khan wrote:

(((I would still prefer a more radical change which abstracts the package directory from the userland))) I agree this would be a great thing. The main balancing act is how do you implement this without requiring every package to be rewritten? If someone could go back two or three years in time and talk to Stig and also talk to the implementers of language-level inclusion, I think a much better solution could have been reached. However, there is hope for PEAR 2.0, no? The problem will then be in separating PEAR 1.x stuff from PEAR 2.x stuff, something I'd like to think about later :).

Greg