Re: The point (BC breakage)

Can somebody stop this guy please, whose only point is that he is too lazy too change his code if wants new features from a package but expects everybody else, be it a programmer or a user, to change their code if they *don't* want new features but instead bug and security fixes. Not only is he stealing us precious time and nerves, now he even starts offending people and granting around because he's almost alone with his opinion. I'm really tired of this discussion, I think all arguments have been exchanged, let's stop it and make a vote. Zitat von Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>: > Hi! > > Rob Hutton wrote: > > > Thank you Josh, you are 110% correct. > > > > Think Y2K crisis. Code running on mainframes that was 40 years old, 30 > > years old, 20 years old, 10 years old, 1 year old, 10 days old that all > > depended on different versions of the same library. To the point that > it > > was easier to start over with current technology than to fix the > problem in > > a lot of cases. You don't intentionally F*** the code just because you > > don't think that someone should not be running 20 or 30 year old code. > > So you are backing the solution that will make it easier to f**k up your > code > with PEAR? How nice of you! > > > Not > > if you acutally want someone using your code. Maybe you don't want > anyone > > using PEAR? > > Yes, we don't want anyone using PEAR. And no one is actually using it > right now. > > NOW GO AWAY, TROLL! > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Jan. -- http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project http://www.ammma.de - discover your knowledge http://www.tip4all.de - Deine private Tippgemeinschaft