Re: BC solution for Alexey's good point :)
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Sat, 27 Sep 2003 08:42:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: BC solution for Alexey's good point :) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22108@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> And last but not least:
> 4) My good point was that if someone needs this BS then HE IS PERFECTLY CAPABLE
> OF CREATING CUSTOMIZED PACKAGES (Foo_v2) WITH CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE. I just
> don't get why this s**t must be mandatory and why I should change my
> applications IF I DON'T NEED THIS "FUNCTIONALITY". This wasn't addressed at
> all.
I was seeing things more like package_x 1.0 depends on version 1.1 of package_y. If package_y goes
up to 2.0 and breaks BC and i need package_y 2.0. That means every app or package for that matter
must have its own complete pear tree ?
Arnaud.