Re: potential public web solution

# greg@chiaraquartet.net / 2003-10-03 13:13:55 -0400: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > that's quite an administrative nightmare, isn't it? I have a web > > server with ~50 sites, do you want me have 50 parallel PEAR > > installations? > > As it stands right now, none of them can use packages like HTML_TreeMenu > through PEAR, they have to simply unzip the thing directly. but your proposal doesn't make the situation any better for me. > The point would be that each user can independently use the pear > installer on their local site, and maintain that installation > themselves, the way they maintain the source code they upload > themselves. there's one user: me (ok, and two or three colleagues) > I assume you don't support all 50 site's web pages, but I > don't maintain a 50 site web server, so I could be wrong :) that's exactly what we do. we create, and maintain, sites and applications for people who are not capable of, or unwilling to, do it for themselves. we don't even provide shell access to our customers. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html