Re: potential public web solution
| From: | Roman Neuhauser | Date: | Fri, 03 Oct 2003 19:04:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: potential public web solution | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22368@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
# greg@chiaraquartet.net / 2003-10-03 13:23:51 -0400:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> ># greg@chiaraquartet.net / 2003-10-03 13:13:55 -0400:
> >>I assume you don't support all 50 site's web pages, but I
> >>don't maintain a 50 site web server, so I could be wrong :)
> >
> > that's exactly what we do. we create, and maintain, sites and
> > applications for people who are not capable of, or unwilling to,
> > do it for themselves. we don't even provide shell access to our
> > customers.
>
> OK, well, my idea would allow the retrieval of a relative path. You can
> use Apache aliasing to make sure that the relative path works for every
> virtual domain. In other words, the full path to the data files would
> not matter in a web context, only the relative path from document_root "/"
>
> http://foo.example.com/pear-files/pear/HTML_TreeMenu/images
> http://foo2.example.com/pear-files/pear/HTML_TreeMenu/images
>
> These would be aliases for each other.
>
> Would this solve the problem in your case?
This is almost exactly what I was thinking of for some time now.
Just declare /pear/<package> as the official standard access point
to web fodder, and you're set. Or, if you want to get really fancy,
you could massage httpd.conf during install.
IOW: prefix/lib/php <-- classess
prefix/share/php <-- web media
or something along those lines...
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html