Re: Call for Votes: PEAR::Calendar
| From: | Markus Wolff | Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:00:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Call for Votes: PEAR::Calendar | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22937@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hfuecks@phppatterns.com wrote:
Anyway - if there's a major outcry against so many classes, how about this - add the the first version of the package as is so people can use it then merge it all together before it's a stable release - should be possible without having to break APIs, allowing stuff like HTML_Calendar to get started.Just to throw my humble opinion in, I like the package a lot how it is right now. I don't think the many classes lead to confusion, but make usage of the package a lot clearer than it would be with less classes/methods, but more arguments for each method. And if it's even performing better - why bother about the number of classes? CU Markus