Re: Call for Votes: PEAR::Calendar

Lorenzo, Thanks for taking time to check it out (and glad it's been useful to you). Regarding your suggestions; 1) last*() should be called prev*(). Good point - never occurred to me before - will do that. 2) use PEAR::Date as backend Definately, but I'd like to avoid be the person that does the work there though. If anyone wants to help maintain this package, implementing a second engine based on PEAR::Date could be a great way to get familiar with the code. 3) follow a directory structure as every PEAR pkg does: Calendar_Engine_Factory.php should be Calendar/Engine/Factory.php and follow CS like using "require_once" No problems. 4) Alan's proposal of handling dates this way: > $nextday = $date->make($date->year, $date->month, $date+1); > $nextmonth = $date->make($date->year, $date->month+1, $date); Yep - been pondering this one. Like it although there are some difficulties to overcome (for example a week and a day use the same argument index - $Week = & new Calendar_Week(2003,10,1); and $Day = & new Calendar_Day(2003,10,1); - will see what I can come up with - perhaps using constants to control behaviour?) 5) week management. See what you mean. Weeks are the "weakest link" right now. Need to spend some time work it out but your suggestion, using the weeks from the previous / next month, sounds like a good way. OK - so back to the call for votes. How about this - version 0.1 (the first release) will include changes 1 and 3 above. The rest will be something for version 0.2, when there's time (plus tutorials and [note to self] unit tests). That sound acceptable? So far the count is +1 from Lorenzo and (I think) +1 from Markus Wolff.