Re: PHP_ProcessWatcher

Hi Stefan Neufeind, you wrote: > On 7 Nov 2003 at 13:42, Michael Wallner wrote: >>This is planned, and should not be a big task. > > > Well, but isn't it somehow again your run()-loop? Or do you think of > registering a callback-function? 1st: Running a loop is optional (even not working yet). 2nd: Consider this: --- ### --- <executes> <shell>echo '%' >> /var/log/pwatch</shell> <php>mail_me('%')</php> </executes> --- foreach($watch[...][executes] as $mode => $action) { if ( $mode == 'php' ) { eval(str_replace('%', $str, $action); } ... } --- ### ---- > Yeah, and I mean it would be nice to also be able to get a parsed > output of ps (parsed into an array). Well this is sored in PHP_ProcessWatcher::_procs, which could be made publicly availbale, or even through a method. > This is connected to the previous paragraph: It would be nice to be > able to get an array with information on running processes or even ob > a subset of processes (e.g. all "httpd"-processes). This way you > could imagine creating a html-page / xml-page that allows you to > monitor all (!) running processes interactively over a webserver. > This would just require allowing the parsed ps-output to be passed > back to the calling script. Ah, I see - alright, seems reasonable to me. Regards, -- Michael - < mike(@)php.net >

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]