RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR] Re: bcompiler
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:48:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR] Re: bcompiler | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-24444@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> From: George Schlossnagle [mailto:george@omniti.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:46 PM
> To: Stefan Neufeind
>
> On Dec 15, 2003, at 3:42 PM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
>
> > On 15 Dec 2003 at 21:30, Thorsten Suckow-Homberg wrote:
> >
> >> You might want to take a look at mmcache.
> >>
> >> http://turck-mmcache.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > Okay, this thread is getting a bit OT - sorry for that. But it's
> > interesting to see these comparisons. Had problems trying out APC -
> > but Turck MMCache seems to be actively maintained. Hmm - anybody got
> > practical experience with it? Maybe we could get the programmer to
> > contribute his code to pecl?
>
> I don't see any postings from you regarding your APC problems.
The Eye is always watching ;-)
No really people should really try to submit bug reports for things. Its
really hard for a developer to get stuff like this in a sentence while the
issue was never brought to his attention. It's the same with the pear
installer and actually any OS project there is. Submit bug reports. I guess
with pear and pecl we are not running into a flood of bogus reports yet so
we can handle it ... really ;-)
Regards,
Lukas