Re: PEAR_DelegateOwner Part Deux

On Wed Jan 28, 2004 at 03:3250PM -0500, lingwitt@bellsouth.net wrote: > I think I went down the wrong path. I did not intend to merge with > PEAR_Autoloader, or even replace it, as PEAR_DelegateOwner can and > should stand on its own as a class. If, however, replacement is the > direction, I propose this: > > Let PEAR_Autoloader be a subclass of PEAR_DelegateOwner, and then the > old API can simply map to that of DelegateOwner. > > The only problem is that PEAR_Autoloader deals with autoloading code, > which is not the purpose of PEAR_Delegate owner. Nevertheless, the old > API could wrap the new PHP 5 autoloading mechanism. Could the active maintainers of the core classes please comment on this? Lingwitt has been trying to contribute this stuff for months now, but comments have been rare on the topic. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/