Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for Structures::Structures_Graph
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:00:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for Structures::Structures_Graph | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25490@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 at 14:57:57, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:13:53 +0000
> Sérgio Carvalho <sergio.carvalho@portugalmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As for the naming, I've called it Image_Digraph to avoid the name
> > clash with the existing Image_Graph. The existing Image_Graph is not a
> > candidate for receiving Image_Digraph as an add-on. Image_Graph is a
> > charting or data plotting package. I have no idea if PEAR allows
> > package name changes, so I didn't take the path of proposing a rename
> > of Image_Graph to Image_Plot or Image_Chart.
>
> I'm all in favour to rename Image_Graph to Image_Plot (charts are only
> a kind of plot ;) ). This reflects better its purposes. As you said
> there is no real synonim for"Graph" and all projects related to graphs
> us"graph":)
Hmm, I can understand what you mean. But renaming is not really good possible
anymore since the name has now already been settled in various places (PHP
Magazine as well as some conferences for this year). Would lead to too much
confusion. It's not them I'm unwilling ... but it wouldn't be clever in my
eyes - sorry!
Stefan