Re: Re: [PEPr] Proposal for Structures::Structures_Graph

Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:

Your package is alpha. There is no problem to rename it. Regardless if you have talked about it in any mags/blogs/whatever around ;).

I think this is a discussion outside the scope of the Structures_Graph proposal. We can pick the issue later on, when I do propose Image_Digraph, or whatever its final name will be. I have no formed opinion on the subject of package renaming in Pear. This is a case where it's highly obvious the names should be rearranged. However, if the change breaks anyone's software, be it another PEAR package or software built with PEAR, it's out of question. I guess that, as PEAR grows, this is a real issue, and rules should be laid out by the core PEAR team. Cheers, Sérgio Carvalho