Re: Call for votes on Config_Registry is over :(

<quote who="Laurent Laville"> > In waiting your reactions, i was surprised to received two days before (Feb > 8), the first mail [1] > then today the second mail [2]. The email stuff of your proposal is really wired. I can not imaging where this results from, since it seems not to resolve configuration constants correctly. All other proposals do. That's why the PEPr generated emails are not send to pear-dev. > After all, i'm not really surprised. > * First, by this "PEPr bug" > * Second, by PEAR community reaction that won't wote after Chuck Hagenbuch > 's point of view (-1 without comment). That'd be a bug, too, since PEPr should not allow -1 votes without a comment. I will go on checking that. Sorry for the trouble! Regards, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt a passion for php http://www.schlitt.info