#562 [Opn->Asn]: send bug summary to pear-qa

From: Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:31:24 +0000
Subject: #562 [Opn->Asn]: send bug summary to pear-qa
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25750@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
ID: 562 Updated by: mj@php.net Reported By: smith at backendmedia dot com -Status: Open +Status: Assigned Bug Type: Bug System Operating System: Irrelevant PHP Version: Irrelevant -Assigned To: +Assigned To: mj New Comment: So to sum it up: * Weekly summaries will be send to pear-qa * A copy of all bug reports and the appendant comments will be send to pear-bugs. If that is the way to go, I'll take care of getting the stuff set up. (I'm also working towards having a announcement list, but did not get a response from the people in charge yet.) Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-02-20 11:29:37] neufeind@php.net Already yeah. After a clarifying discussion I've agreed with Lukas that a mailinglist would be best. However neither pear-dev nor pear-qa should be flooded with messages, since others might suffer from that "noise". So we propose to open a pear-bug-list (similar to pear-cvs) which everbody interested is invited to join. We expect >40 mails per week .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-02-20 11:16:41] toby@php.net I personally prefer mailinglists. :) Getting the latest issues directly aggregated inside one application is quite cool! :) Maybe a seperated mailinglist pear-bugs is the best solution. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-02-20 11:00:20] neufeind@php.net Well, I don't see why such a summary would be helpful. You can easily browse the bugs (by relevance, by package, ...) via the bug-system from time to time. And what would "who closed the bugs" be needed for? There might be several people involved in the solution - so imho it doesn't really matter who actually closed the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-02-20 10:14:12] toby@php.net I guess just routing all bug mails to pear-qa would last, shouldn't it? The header and subject additions of the bug-system should enable everyone to filter them out. Otherwise I'd prefer a normal new mailinglist instead of a summary, since each bug is a single topic and and bug-actions should be viewable grouped by bug (threads). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2004-02-20 09:40:10] lsmith@php.net alternatively I guess a dedicated bug list would also do, if the summary is too much effort to implement. QA really needs to know what is going on. Who closes bugs, how many open etc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=562 -- Edit this bug report at http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=562&edit=1

« previous php.pear.dev (#25750) next »