Re: Re: implementing emeritus

Daniel Convissor <danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote: > Hola: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:25:03PM -0500, Greg Beaver wrote: > > > > I didn't get the sense that this was agreed on. > > To me it seemed the majority of people participating in the thread agreed. Didn't seem that way to me. Soon as I mentioned that it might be a little obscure, three (iirc) other people agreed including Greg. It's not a commonly used term in English so the likelyhood of peeps whose first language isn't English understanding it is tiny. +1 for a more obvious term, like "inactive". -- Richard Heyes _________________________________________________________ This mail sent using V-webmail - http://www.v-webmail.org