Re: Status: PEAR Meeting in Amsterdam
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:33:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Status: PEAR Meeting in Amsterdam | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26909@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I bet we already have "enough" people. There are 7 now on the list
below (8 with Arnaud), afaik we have room for max (!) 13. And I'm
sure that we'll reach 13 without a problem :-) So maybe we should
avoid a big announcement since we won't have room for everybody. This
is not "fair", but imho a reasonable solution due to the limited
amout of space and time we have. Active pear-devs already know the
date for quite a while now, and imho that's the main audience we need
for those topics.
Stefan
On 30 Mar 2004 at 16:34, Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote:
> Should we announce this event on pear.php.net? For the IRC part of the meeting
> it should no problem to have some people w/ ops monitoring for spammers and
> misconduct. For the meatspace meeting, you guys will just need to control
> yourselves :-)
>
> If there is an announcement, make sure to indicate that the time is the local
> time in Amsterdam.
>
> --- Tobias Schlitt <tobias@schlitt.info> wrote:
> > Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > For those who did not follow the thread about the meeting and do not
> > want to run through all the mails, here the current status of what is
> > planned:
> >
> > Date: 03.05.2004
> > Time: 18:30
> > Location: Office of "Jeroen Houben"
> >
> > Planned equipment:
> > - Life IRC chat to enable everyone to attend
> > - Lifestream of Audio/Video
> >
> > Currently planned attendees:
> >
> > 1) Toby
> > 2) Stefan
> > 3) Lukas
> > 4) Pierre
> > 5) Cipri
> > 6) Bertrand
> > 7) Sebastian
> >
> > Currently planned agenda:
> >
> > - Review of the PEAR Group
> > - PEAR roadmap definition (incl. PEARWeb)
> > - Clear definition of PEAR QA goals and powers
> >
> > For everyone who'd like to attend, who has additions to the agenda or other
> > enhancements, please respond to this email. If I forgott someone, please
> > respond too!