Fw: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Template Proposal
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Sat, 10 Nov 2001 03:45:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Fw: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Template Proposal | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-2773@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> The "standard core library" will be a special package avaible to
> download at pear.php.net with a set of packages inside that are supposed
> to be installed always if you want to use other Pear classes. There was
> long time ago a discussion about this topic and that was the final
> decision.
And IMHO a good one. As I said, this kind of informations must be available at pear.php.net . PEAR
missed enduser docs, release plan and real visibility to the target, the php developpers (you know,
the strange people who uses php for his job/passion/for fun asking for an abstract/tree/cache lib ?
;)). I m this kind of user. Just realize (sorry I m not so fast ;)) the potential of PEAR the last
months (just take time to read this ML).
> Who is a "pear developer"? IMHO the people who have contributed with
> more number of packages, are actively supporting Pear (reviewing, fixing
> bugs, enhancing) and/or perhaps also have more time involved, have some
> kind of extra karma, but anyone who has contributed classes to Pear can
> be considered a pear developer.
I will put documentations writer in "have some extra karma" ;).
pa