Re: PEAR Account Request: lanceromance

Joe Stump wrote:

Completely agreed. This is the second request that's come through in as many days that don't even come close to qualifying. I don't think it's the person requesting's fault either. Something like the following would be great: <b>I am not applying for an account for any of the following reasons:</b> [] To submit a patch [] To learn [] To submit some of my l33+ c0d3 --Joe

Hi, Good start, but more something like this: ----------------------------------------------------- I'm applying for a PEAR account for the following reasons: [ ] Submit a patch [ ] To learn [ ] To install and use PEAR [ ] To contribute a new package to PEAR: [________________] (short package description) [ ] To help maintain an existing package: [_______________] (Name of package) [ ] I have already contacted the package maintainer(s) about it. [ ] I have a package to release through the PEAR packager/installer

    but not through CVS: [_______________________] (short description of package)

----------------------------------------------------- If items 4-6 are not filled properly, a page would immediately inform them that an account is not required. Asking for package information up-front would deter "casual" applicants. -Philippe