Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC

From: Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 06:46:09 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
It's not really a technical concern, as I realized after I made the comment, that you can specify docs/test directories using the installer: pear config-set test_dir .... I think you should just remove the section about docs/test etc. - it just adds confusion, and is a bit off-topic for the RFC.. Regards alan Tobias Schlitt wrote:
PEPr wrote:
Klaus Guenther (http://pear.php.net/user/thesaur) has commented on the proposal for RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC. Comment: Alan Knowles wrote: "- tests/docs/etc. should never be within the include path, it makes accidental includes possible, and is a slight security concern." Toby responded: "This is not possible in the current infrastructure, since docs/tests are installed below the main pear/ directory, which is added to the include path." Unfortunately, Toby is wrong. docs (incl. examples) and tests are currently below the included pear installation directory. IMHO, this is an infrastructure problem that needs to be addressed.
What's the difference to what I said?
-- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.com

« previous php.pear.dev (#29052) next »