Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC
| From: | Klaus Guenther | Date: | Mon, 10 May 2004 08:09:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29054@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Tobias Schlitt wrote:
PEPr wrote:Tell me to read... lol... I somehow read _above_ in your text. forget my criticism. But I do think something needs to be done about this from an infrastructural perspective. Sorry for the noise. KlausKlaus Guenther (http://pear.php.net/user/thesaur) has commented on the proposal for RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC. Comment: Alan Knowles wrote: "- tests/docs/etc. should never be within the include path, it makes accidental includes possible, and is a slight security concern." Toby responded: "This is not possible in the current infrastructure, since docs/tests are installed below the main pear/ directory, which is added to the include path." Unfortunately, Toby is wrong. docs (incl. examples) and tests are currently below the included pear installation directory. IMHO, this is an infrastructure problem that needs to be addressed.What's the difference to what I said?