Re: [PEPr] +1 for PHP::PHP_Modules
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Sat, 15 May 2004 02:49:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for PHP::PHP_Modules | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29254@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
The Problem is, that Modules a extremely abstract word.. - modules of what? and what does it do with these modules?
If it intends to support Classes and Functions then
PHP_CodeLoader
Is probably far more descriptive and suitable..?
Regards
Alan
Eric Gach wrote:
Alan, PEPr wrote:Alan Knowles (http://pear.php.net/user/alan_k) has voted +1 on the proposal for PHP::PHP_Modules. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=68 Vote information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=68&handle=alan_k This vote is conditional. The condition is: Please choose a more descriptive name.This name, I feel, is suitable for the project because of plans I have for future development. These plans include extending support for not only just modules/functions but for classes. Variable support will also be something worked into this, as well as other module dependencies. So as far as another name goes... I believe this one is descriptive enough due to the fact that it loads modules and not just functions.