Re: [PEPr] +1 for PHP::PHP_Modules

Quoting Eric Gach <eric@php-oop.net>:

I would like to ask if anyone else has any issues with the name? PHP_Modules isn't a great name, but it may be the best name. I don't see a need to change it from one "high level and abstract" name to another that doesn't truly describe what the class does.

I don't think PHP_Modules is a good name for what the class does. PHP_Modules, to me, implies an uber-generic "piece of code". And if that's what your code does, I don't think we need a PEAR package for that (wouldn't that be a PEAR package?). If it does something else (which you've implied), then it should probably allude to that other functionality in the name. -chuck -- "Regard my poor demoralized mule!" - Juan Valdez