Re: Re: HTML_Form and accesskeys

On May 17, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Daniel Convissor wrote:

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 03:13:54PM +0200, David Costa wrote:

I proposed to take over some time ago but there wasn't an interest seen quickform obvious superiority.

... snip ...

Unless you get an approval from Stig, I think we should leave it as it is You can see my comments/patch suggestion on the previous 2 bugs I analyzed.

Not sure I agree. Found only postings from you in the archives on MARC (their search mechanism sucks).

I verified bugs 658 and 659 http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php?direction=ASC&cmd=display&status=Open&package_name[0]=HTML_Form

Even if that's the way we go, this brings up the fact that we need some way of clearly marking packages as deprecated.

I agree on this. Users might be confused on not knowing which package to use. We could perhaps make it "freeze" if it sound better then deprecated but it is something to be discussed at QA level more then dev. Cheers David Costa

Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y

            data intensive web and database programming
                http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/

4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409 --PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php