Re: PEAR QA: Vote

Tobias Schlitt wrote:

Hi! I'm not really sure, if the voting process will work properly like this... A simple email voting on the QA Core member would be more efficient here. Especially since this kind of procedure is not a very common one in PEAR, there's no need to implement an automated process. Email voting could look like this: 1. Start a thread for nomination (posting an email there automatically nominates). 2. After 2 weeks post a new thread with all volunteers in the following way: [] Name [] Name 3. Every developer may answer to this and vote by adding a X to the [] before the desired names (up to 7). 4. After 2 weeks just count the votes. This is IMHO more practical for every party. Just by $ .02. Regards, Toby

Using PEPr gives us a better record of things though, one of my main reasons for using it... - Davey