Re: [CS] Naming Conventions (PHP5 OO)

Cipriano Groenendal wrote: >> >At some point you have to decide whether you want to be a PEAR developer >> >or not. Code not complying with CS will not be allowed in PEAR. Sorry >> >about that. And as you can see, it's now been put to vote. >> But for now, I won't use this rule even if it goes into CS. Anyway, there >is a >> lot of code in PEAR that is not CS compliant, so it does not really matter >I >> guess. > >And with an attitude like this, it never will be. The standards were set up >for a reason, and that reason was not to to keep the pear developers off the >street and busy fixing their code, but to keep the code in PEAR nice and >uniform, following a single, good, CS. > >"He didn't do it either" is not an excuse not to follow CS. I mean, by looking at the existing code in PEAR, that it doesn't seem to be such a big concern to follow PEAR CS. I for one have always tried to follow the rules as close as I could. And I will continue to do so until I find the rules are stupid, something which apparently will come sooner than I thought. Just to be sure you understand what I am saying: "I won't prefix my protected vars with underscores, whether it is one, two or three underscores". I hope that's ok with everyone :) Bertrand Mansion Mamasam