Re: Subject/Observer design pattern in PEAR

Philippe Jausions wrote:

Hi, Just wondering if the PEAR group advised about the member and method names to be used for the Subject/Observer design pattern? - Add observer - Remove observer - Notify observers - Constraint on object type for observers - ID of observers Apparently there is no consistency in the PEAR packages that use that pattern.

So far, there is no standard naming convention for such things. There was merely the private/public distinction. However, certain names have become established for certain functions (e.g., toHtml, toString, etc.). There certainly would be some benefit in promoting consistency :-) Klaus